Q&A Tool

Category:  Wind - General
Subject:  Substantially Complete Projects (ESR Process)
ID:  10766
Date:  9/15/2009
Question:  For projects that have achieved substantial completion under the old ESR process, defined as having submitted a Notice of Completion and the Director of the EAAB (MOE) having determined that the elevation requests have been denied, it appears apparent that under the imminent REA regulations that such projects may procure partial exemption as opposed to requiring a full re-application under the proposed REA process, based on the assumption that the documents have already been reviewed by the various MOE departments and it would seem only any additional requirements would need to be submitted and reviewed under the REA process.

Please confirm that the OPA will also differentiate projects, in the context of the Launch Criteria Score, and also credit projects that have achieved substantial completion under the old ESR process, without having achieved REA exemption, over and above projects that have not achieved substantial completion under the old ESR process. Otherwise as it stands, a project having achieved substantial completion under the old ESR process would be rated equally to a project that has had no environmental work undertaken to date and in the worst case possibly compared negatively in the event of a tie break - if the other project had happened to have an earlier Access Rights Date.

Given that that the currently proposed rules are clearly unacceptable as a measure of the seriousness of the two projects - how does the OPA intend to recognise the projects that have achieved substantial completion in terms of the existing ESR process.

 

Answer:  Projects will only receive a Criteria point if they are not required to obtain an REA under the new process - this is a pass or fail option. There are currently no provisions for projects that reached milestones within the old assessment process but still need to complete the new REA.

Back to Q&A Tool