Could the price degression be applied on a "per developer" basis (after 10MW is installed), rather than globally? This would spread the most economically preferable contracts more evenly, allowing smaller developers to compete on a more equal footing.

If the global limit of 100MW per price rung is still desired, it would be nice if at least 20MW of each price rung was reserved for smaller developers (<=2MW). IMO, the price for smaller developers shouldn't be subject to these automatic price adjustments; instead, they should be updated every one or two years as needed.

If you disagree with the OPA's proposed approach, we welcome submissions from stakeholders through the online "Make a Submission" tool. Submissions should include recommendations for an alternative approach, as well as a justification for the alternative approach.

The OPA's proposed FIT price schedule will be the topic of discussion during the April 7th Stakeholder Engagement Session. The rationale for the automatic price trigger will be explained during this session.